Stage2

STAGE 2

INTERVENTION PROTOTYPE

CONSTITUENT MEETING OF MEXICO

THEME

PLENARY MEETINGS INITIAL SESSIONS

I.- INFORMAL DIALOGUE (Informal sessions).

II.- GENERAL DIALOGUE (Formal session).

III.- INFORMAL CONSULTATIONS (Approaches).

IV.- DIALOGUE IN PARTICULAR (Agenda agenda, formal session).

V.- FINAL PLENARY. (Resolutive)

TYPE EXAMPLE OF THE AGENDA

Circumstantial record:

Based on article 9 of the Constitution of 1857 and its similar one of the pretended one of 1917, we citizens C ___________ and C___________ meet, being the __ of the day _______ of the year __________, in the public place _______, territory of the Mexican Republic .

As a first event, it proceeds to verify if the first requirement is met, which consists of the minimum meeting of 2 people, for which the physical presence of _____ people who were told to be the citizens is effectively realized: ______ who fully identify with __________ by whose identification one can reach the conviction that they are who they say they are, because the physical features of the photographs of said identifications correspond faithfully to those present; the first said to have his address in _______ the second said to have his address in _________….

Next, it is proceeded to verify if the second requirement is met, which those present said in this case that there are two lawful objectives or legally admissible purposes, which consist first of the restoration of the constitutional order of the Republic, which is allowed in both. constitutions, that of 1857 and that of 1917 in articles 128 and 135 respectively, consisting of restoring the constitutional order of the Republic; and the second lawful objective or legally admissible purpose consists of modifying the form of government of the Mexican Republic, which is equally permitted in both constitutions, that of 1857 and that of 1917, their similar common article number 39 respectively. Thus, the first of those present named ________ was questioned separately, to whom the two objectives of the meeting set out above were read, stating that, if the two objectives expressed in this document are true, the second of those present is now questioned separately. Present named __________, to whom the two aforementioned objectives were also read, stating that these are indeed the two objectives of the meeting.

As an act followed to verify compliance with the third requirement, which consists of verifying that those who are at the meeting have the quality of citizens of the Mexican Republic, which is being requested at this time, verify that they are Mexican citizens, and accessing them the first of those present __________ delivers a certified copy of his birth certificate and one of the CURP, related to the population registry, and the second person ___________ also proceeds to deliver his certified copy of the birth certificate and CURP of registration of population population. You are informed that said documents will be safeguarded to verify to the person who requested it, the fulfillment of said requirement.

Now, to confirm that this meeting that is intended to be held has the possibility of legitimately deliberating, those present are asked if they are currently carrying any type of weapon; questioned the first __________ states under protest to tell the truth that he does not carry a weapon of any nature and it is not his intention to discredit the legality of this meeting, that furthermore I do not have similar things in my possessions; Now the second ________ is questioned, who, stating under protest to tell the truth, that I do not carry any weapon of any nature, that this meeting is very important and I do not intend to detract from its legitimacy, in addition to the fact that within my assets there is nothing similar.

Now the first of those present ___________ is asked to describe to us what the purpose of this meeting is, expressing that it is a meeting to deal with political affairs of the country; and on his turn now the second _______ is asked the same thing, who states that it is a meeting with the aim of discussing political issues in the country.

In the use of his voice, the citizen __________ expresses that there is another characteristic of the meeting, which is his peaceful condition; then the citizen ________ also states that the meeting will be peaceful.

To prove that the authority was informed, check with the document duly stamped that it was communicated in advance to the corresponding authority, by the organizers and promoters of the meeting, the C.C. ____ and ____, a document that clearly specifies that the calling and holding of the meetings will be in a place of public transit so that the governing bodies are able to take the pertinent measures and offer the necessary guarantees for this meeting.

Now while both are standing with their eyes facing east, the C_________ requests the use of the floor from the C ___________ who grants it, and the first one states that he will read a document that both appearing parties prepared previously, and that consists of the declaration of formal installation of the meeting; which says: Being the ____ hours of the day ___ of the month of _______ of the year _____ the undersigned _________ accompanied by ________, whose authorization I have to speak says: I have the patriotic honor of proceeding to declare this public meeting formally installed and peaceful, to deal with political affairs of the country, with an original constituent and constitutional character, with the first lawful objective of restoring the constitutional order of the Mexican Republic, as mandated by articles 128 of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States of 1857 and 136 of which it is said is the constitution of 1917; and second lawful objective of modifying the form of government of the Mexican Republic, as authorized by articles 39 of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States of 1857 and by the same numeral of what is said to be the constitution of 1917, being a public, peaceful, constituent, original meeting, independent of the powers of the State, transitory, of citizens, with full powers, itinerant and due to its purpose of restoring the constitutional order and modifying the form of government of the Mexican Republic, it is also characterized as counterrevolutionary.

By name, this meeting will be referred to hereinafter:

CONSTITUENT MEETING OF MEXICO

To protest as constituent legislators, those present are C. __________ and C._________ standing with their eyes to the east, with his right hand on his heart, the first C. ___________ states: “it is my will and firm intention to be a constituent legislator or constitutional law of the Mexican Republic”; now the second C. _________ states: “it is my will and firm intention to be a constituent or constitutional legislator of the Mexican Republic”.

Those present, after deliberation, agree to abide by the following general bases:

GENERAL TERMS

I.- This constituent arises from the need to make use of the right to meet to deal with the political affairs of the country as allowed by article 39 of the Constitution of the Mexican Republic, which implies the freedom of any and all Mexican citizens to be able to meet with another or other citizens, two or more, for any purpose and objective, provided that said meeting is peaceful and has a lawful purpose. This right is individual and inalienable (non-transferable) but its exercise is of a collective nature, because in order for there to be a meeting like the one protected by Article 9 of the Constitution, there must be at least two subjects, individuals or Mexican citizens. The meeting supposes a transitory temporary scope while the works of the same end, since a meeting of permanent character perhaps resembles an association, therefore, if the purpose is legally admissible and framed of the legality as in this case to change the form of government as authorized by constitutional article 39, in addition, recover the freedom of the Mexican people, restore constitutional order and attend to public accusation as allowed in articles 128 of the 1857 Constitution and 136 of the 1917 Constitution, the meeting meets the requirements for its celebration, it only remains to start the work of the meeting itself.

II.- Articles 9 and 39 of the legitimate and still valid constitution of 1857 and its similar one of 1917, are consistent with article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and resolutions 2200 A (XXI) and 2625 of the Organization of the United Nations (UN) dated 12/16/66 and 10/24/70, relating to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the free self-determination of peoples, confer on us democratic rights to meet in order to alter the form of government in the Mexican Republic, allow the creation of the decision-making figure called Constituent.

III.- A constituent meeting also called “constitutional”, acts as the State itself, exercising all the powers of the sovereign people, and when a citizen integrates as a constituent legislator, the investiture of his personality reaches the quality of a public servant, who renders a personal service of social utility for the nation and that must be financially remunerated for it in his capacity as primary or original legislator in his capacity as a public servant.

IV.- The type of constituent or constitutional meeting that is now integrated, have an “original” connotation to the extent that it arises from the breakdown of an order, whether constitutional or not, in any case it has as its assumption a breakdown of the political system.

V.- This constituent meeting will have as its objective, apart from liberating the people from their kidnappers, to deliberate on the mechanisms to restore the constitutional order of the republic, the attention of the public accusation that exists against the intruders who usurp the public power, in the terms of article 128 of the Constitution of 1857, as well as changing the form of government in the terms of article 39 of the Constitution.

VI.- The constituent meeting has broad powers to submit to the national, state or municipal constituted powers, including even the permanent constituent of the Congress of the Union who is exercising supposed functions as legislators or senators. She herself can decide to assume all the powers directly, the system of government is then of meeting itself while the constitutional bases of the new political system are determined. The constituted powers become subordinate delegates who are accountable for their acts to the meeting, and it can, when it freely deems it so, remove them or decide on their new condition.

VII.- The constituent meeting can decide to assume the ratification of the acts of the executive branch of the State, without dismissing the head of State or the head of government or governments of the federative entities, or on the contrary substituting them without ratification.

VIII.- The constituent can assume the legislative function directly, which entails the dissolution of the Parliament or permanent constituent called the Congress of the Union that is supposedly in office, or decides to coexist with it.

IX.- The constitutional constituent can decide the total or partial reorganization of the judicial branch of the State.

X.- The constituent can decide the dissolution of the regional, local, municipal or any other type of constituted powers, or in any case, their reorganization, while approving the definitive configuration of the form of State according to its resolutions.

XI.- Regarding the Integration of a Constituent Meeting, the following criteria are adopted:

Article 39 of the Constitution resolves two questions: who? and when?: 1st.- Who?: – THE PEOPLE – That includes all 120 million Mexican citizens without excluding any. 2nd.- When?: – AT ALL TIMES – It supposes a valid right from moment to moment; but article 39 of the Constitution does not resolve an essential question: How? The Constitution does not specify the mechanisms to organize the constituent process or the minimum or maximum number of legislators, consequently leaving the people free to decide on their investiture as sovereign. Indeed, the Mexican people have 120 million wills, which can unilaterally decide freely and spontaneously “the best moment” and the “organizational mechanisms of the constitutional process.” Thus, things remain to be resolved, which ones? Of the 120 million that make up the sovereign people, they must be those who appear as “assembly members”, faced with the dilemma that even these are only part of a very broad sovereign body. What parts of individual entities of the body called people? are fit to represent the set of millions of individual parts of citizens? The answer is very simple, made the call by a single sovereign individual, anyone, those who freely activate their conscience, will or intention to participate will be free to attend it, because the law does not regulate the fact that someone is represented in a “constituent assembly”, where the law does not distinguish, no one has to do it, therefore the 120 million sovereign citizens are suitable to be constituent legislators; this is a matter more of will than selection, more political than legal.

XII.- On this occasion, it is not worth using any selection process for members of the alleged constituent meeting, since all those who attend will implicitly bring their inalienable investiture as sovereign citizens, there is no doubt about that, moreover, the people as the only part it cannot be divided, that is, self-selecting itself, that would imply a process of self-discrimination that will not apply in this case, since the members of a sovereign people cannot have the burden of going through self-censorship of its members, or to use representatives or attorneys, but each individual must appear personally, asserting their obligation to defend the independence, territory, honor, rights and interests of their country referred to in section I of article 31 of the Constitution; the integration of this assembly does not admit representations, that is to say, all the congressmen will have to have the investiture of sovereigns, for the logical reason that a representative is not sovereign (without authority), this would only achieve the delegitimization of the assembly, since the sovereign power to alter or modify the form of government is strictly INALIENABLE (not transferred), is full, undivided, permanent, non-transferable and imprescriptible.

XIII.- Of the integration of the instances of the constituent: A Constituent meeting for its validity requires to be composed of a minimum of two people, or more in its case, of an indeterminate number of Mexican citizens from a universe of 120 million, who freely attend it, claiming their own right and without the need for substitutes. Each member would have the duty to defend in the meeting, the proposals presented or received from other citizens, those who for some reason cannot be present at the meeting venue are not exempt, since they would be missing a legitimately important appeal and their obligations as citizens.

XIV.- Those citizens who are unable to physically go to the venue(s) of the meeting(s), may do so in other ways without ceasing or ending their attribution to be able to submit proposals to the constituent assembly, of topics, presentations, essays, theses, research reports, etc., to integrate the constituent agenda. Thus, through the proposals received by the assembly, it is how the ideal of the best expression of popular participation must be fulfilled, in the contribution of the best ideas to resolve the difficult situation that the country is going through.

XV.- Of the chronology, agenda and duration of the Constituent Assembly. Depending on the urgency and importance of the work of the constituent meeting, its proponents have proposed a duration period that generally ranges from six months to a year, or more. The duration of the assembly is not binding on it. In use of its attributions, as a constituent body it can modify it as many times as necessary. It also has full freedom in approving its operating rules on an extraordinary basis.

XVI.- The sovereign citizens who attend this meeting, will reach the category of constitutional legislators, with broad powers without any limitation, to deliberate and issue any type of determination or proclamation similar to those of a legislator of the union, on the subject already proposed or new ones that they want to propose, after protesting with their hands over their hearts beforehand, if they are aware of wanting to liberate the people, restore the constitutional order of the Republic, attend to the public accusation of article 128 of the 1857 constitution , and change the form of government as allowed by article 39 of the same fundamental charter cited above.

XVII.- It is specified and invited to be able to identify oneself as a sovereign constitutionalist, adopting the white color for clothing (suits or shirts) and; also a rod of any kind that will symbolize authority or command staff.

Formal installation

Being _ of _ of the year _______, the beginning of the work of the Constituent Assembly is declared for the initial plenary of the informal session and informal dialogues.

The sovereign citizens who attend this meeting _______ and _____________ agree to proclaim that the development of the work of this constituent meeting includes the two stages described below:

First stage: Of the Restoration of the Constitutional Order

In order to comply with the provisions of article 128 of the Constitution of 1857 and as is also authorized in article 136 of the Constitution of 1917, this Constituent Assembly is kind enough to provide that the scope of its provisions includes the entire national territory islands, reefs, corns and territorial seas, over which the following Restoration Plan of the Constitutional Order of the Mexican Republic will have jurisdiction.

In accordance with article 9 of the legitimate Constitution of 1857, the constituent assembly in its first stage will be a meeting of a peaceful and temporarily transitory nature, with the purpose of exercising the action contained in a right enshrined in article 128 of the Constitution of 1857, to restore the constitutional order of the Mexican Republic, which will take place in public places that allow and guarantee free access to attendees, with the sole condition of previously notifying the authorities that said meeting or meetings will take place. in the place, date and time determined, for the sole purpose that they can in turn, take the necessary steps that the case warrants and make it known to other citizens.

Second stage: Modify the form of Government.

With the purpose of activating the action and making valid the right enshrined for Mexican citizens in article 39 of the 1857 Constitution, and its similar in the same numeral of the 1917 constitution, the constituent assembly in its second stage will be a meeting of peaceful and temporarily transitory, itinerant, with full powers, independent, public, peaceful, with the lawful purpose of altering or modifying the form of government of the Mexican Republic, which will take place in public places that allow and guarantee free access of the attendees, with the sole condition of prior notice to the authorities that said meeting or meetings will take place in the place, date and time determined, for the sole purpose that they can in turn, take the necessary steps that the case merits and make it known to other citizens.

FIRST STAGE

Restoration of constitutional order

Article 1).- All electoral processes held since 1876 are declared attacks on national sovereignty, and with this, all governments that owe their permanence in power to lack of legitimacy are considered to lack a constitutional mission; therefore, it is appropriate to dismiss as President of the Mexican Republic the current president of the six-year term 2018-2024, being subject, according to article 128 of the legitimate and still valid Constitution of 1857, to answer for his conduct and to account for the use of the powers that would have been conferred on him under his condition as a cooperator in a rebellion

This same provision also applies to all elected officials who currently work at the three levels of government.

PROCLAMATION 1. – The current president of the six-year term 2018-2024 is called to ignore and is ordered to be ignored as President of the Mexican Republic, being subject, according to article 128 of the Constitution of 1857, to answer for his conduct and account for the use of the powers that would have been conferred on him in his capacity as a cooperator in a rebellion.

PROCLAMATION 2. – It is called to disavow and it is ordered to disavow all the elected officials who currently work in the three levels of government throughout the Mexican Republic, being subject, according to article 128 of the Constitution of 1857, to answer their conduct and give an account of the use of the powers that would have been conferred on them in their capacity as collaborators in a rebellion.

Restoration of the freedom of the Mexican people.

Article 2.- In observance of article 128 of the Constitution of 1857, the freedom of the Mexican people is declared restored, which was undermined by the imposition of governments contrary to said fundamental letter, thus leaving the possibility of making use of all the guarantees and rights that it enshrines.

PROCLAMATION 1. – This sovereignty calls to restore and commands to restore the freedom of the Mexican people that was kidnapped by military coups and revolutions since 1876.

PROCLAMATION 2. – This sovereignty calls for the restoration and commands the restoration of the constitutional guarantees of Mexican citizens enshrined in the legitimate Constitution of 1857.

Of the Restoration of the legitimate Constitution of 1857.

Article 3). – The Constitution of 1857 in the year 1976 was suspended due to the military coup of Don Porfirio Díaz, in such a way that based on article 128 it is provided that, once the people regain their freedom, they will ensure restore its validity.

PROCLAMATION 1.- It is to be restored and the legitimacy and validity of the Constitution of 1857, promulgated on February 5 of the same year, is restored, which is identified because it contains 128 articles, which contains several titles, sections and chapters such as: Title 1 Section 1 Of the rights of man; Section 2 Of the Mexicans; Section 4 Of Mexican citizens; Title 2 Section 1 Of national sovereignty and the form of Government; Section 2 Of the integral parts of the Federation and of the national territory; Title 3 Of the division of powers; Section 1 of the Legislative Branch; Paragraph 2 of the initiative and formation of Laws; Paragraph 3 Of the functions of the General Congress; Paragraph 4 of the Permanent Deputation; Section II Of the Executive Power; Section 3 of the Judiciary; Title 4 Of the responsibility of public officials; Title 5 Of the States of the Federation; Title VII of the Amendment to the Constitution; Title 8 Of the inviolability of the Constitution.

PROCLAMATION 2.- They are to be restored and the legitimacy and validity of the additions and reforms validly introduced in the constitution of 1857, until before the military coup of Don Porfirio Díaz in the year 1876; such as: Reform of January 24, 1861 to article 124; Reform of April 14, 1862 to article 124; Addition of April 29, 1863 to article 43; Addition of November 18, 1868 to article 43; Addition of April 16, 1869 to article 43; Addition and reforms of September 25, 1873, Additions and reforms of November 13, 1874. Does not apply because it invalidates the reform of May 5, 1878 and subsequent ones.

Of federalism: Of the federation of States.

Article 4).- The principles of the confederation of states consigned in the great charter of 1857 must be respected, particularly what is established in its article 43, this sovereignty restores the Federal Republic as a form of state organization, recognizing solely and exclusively as integral parts of the Federation to the following states: Aguascalientes, Colima, Chiapas, Chihuahua, Durango, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Jalisco, Mexico, Michoacán, Nuevo-León and Coahuila, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas , Tlaxcala, Valley of Mexico, Veracruz, Yucatan, Zacatecas and the Territory of Baja California.

Background

1.- By decree dated April 29, 1863, the State of Campeche was definitively erected, in the same way by decree of November 18, 1863, the State of Coahuila was definitively erected, and by an addition of January 15, 1869 it was definitively erected the State of Hidalgo.

2.- The validity of the Constitution of 1857 having been suspended, article 43 of the Constitution was invalidly reformed, and on December 12, 1884 the Territory… of Tepic was created, formed with the 7th. Canton of the State of Jalisco (Decree No. 17), and on November 24, 1902, the Territory of Quintana Roo was created, which was the original jurisdiction of Yucatan.

3.- Having occurred in the year 1876 the military coup of General Don Porfirio Díaz, it is clear that the constitutional order of the republic is broken and consequently any decree subsequent to that date is null and void, given that the validity of the constitution was suspended, and cannot have been modified in any way; then we have that the creation by decree number 17 of the supposed state of Tepic / Nayarit, territory that belonged to the state of Jalisco, dated December 12, 1884, which was null and consequently illegal by virtue of the fact that the constitution could not have been validly modified by the governments emanating from the rebellion.

4.- In the case of the creation of the state of Quintana Roo, on November 24, 1902 by Decree number 30, having occurred in 1876 the military coup of General Don Porfirio Díaz, it is clear that the constitutional order of the republic and consequently any decree subsequent to that date is null and void, given that the validity of the constitution was suspended, and it cannot have been validly modified by the governments of the rebellion.

Clarifications:

Based on article 72, section III of the Magna Carta: “To form new States within the limits of the existing ones, whenever a population of eighty thousand inhabitants requests it, justifying having the necessary elements to provide for their political existence. In any case, it will listen to the legislatures whose Territory is concerned, and its agreement will only take effect if it is ratified by the majority of the legislatures of the States”, based on article 127 of the Constitution, which establishes: “This Constitution may be added or amended. In order for the additions or reforms to become part of the Constitution, it is required that the Congress of the Union, by the vote of two thirds of its individuals present, agree on the reforms or additions, and that they be approved by the majority. of the state legislatures. The Congress of the Union will compute the votes of the legislatures and declare that the additions or reforms have been approved.”

First: With regard to the creation of or recognition of the new state of Campeche, it is debatable that its creation occurred on April 29, 1863, by virtue of DECREE number 3, since the ratification of the establishment of the State of Campeche did not could have been possible by virtue of the fact that such a decree conflicts with the provisions of article 127 cited above, since among the requirements were the request of 80,000 citizens and the approval of the majority of the state legislatures, without appearing proof of the first, in addition to the fact that according to article 43 of the Constitution, since there are 24 states (and one territory), the majority that was required was 13 states and not 12 as it happened, since it was approved by only the legislatures from the states of Aguascalientes, Colima, Chiapas, Durango, Guerrero, Michoacán, Oaxaca, Querétaro, Sinaloa, Tabasco, Veracruz and Zacatecas.

Second.- The initiative for the creation of the State of Hidalgo did not meet the established requirements of the request of 80 thousand signatures, and we find that the request was in 1861 at the initiative of three federal legislators named Alejandro Garrido, Justino Fernández and José María Revilla , which at first failed to materialize due to the War of Reform, the following year (1862), “the municipalities” of Zimapán, Tulancingo, Tecozautla, Mineral del Monte, El Chico, Tecámac, Itzcuincuitlapico, Tepetitlán, El Arenal, Huascazaloya and Otumba requested their erection as a federative entity that did not bear fruit either, in addition to the fact that there is no evidence of the existence of the 80 thousand signatures of residents of those localities. A third attempt was made by federal deputies Manuel Fernando Soto, Antonio Tagle, Manuel T. Andrade, Gabriel Mancera, Justino Fernández, and Cipriano Robert, who initiated the process, avoiding the requirement of 80,000 citizen applications, and there is also no evidence that Such a decree would have been approved by the majority of the states under the terms of article 127 of the Constitution.

Third. – In the same sense, we have the case of the creation of the state of Morelos, in which once again the requirement of 80,000 citizen requests does not appear to be met, nor is there evidence that such a decree had been approved by the majority of the states in which terms of article 127 of the Constitution.

It is clarified that the supposed existence of the states of Hidalgo, Morelos and the State of Mexico are actually the territorial jurisdiction of the state called Valle de México, and should be recognized as one instead of three different entities.

Fourth. – The same fate befalls the states named two instead of one of “Baja California Sur and Baja California Norte”, because despite the fact that on December 30, 1930, the Congress of the Union and the state legislatures approved the reforms to the Constitution by which the Northern Territory of Baja California and the Southern Territory of Baja California were created, the starting point would be the 28th parallel, were published in the Official Gazette on February 7, 1931. On January 16, 1952, the territory Northern Baja California was admitted as the 28th state of the Mexican Union. On October 8, 1974, the southern territory of Baja California was admitted as the 30th state. However, since the validity of the constitution was suspended from 1876, it could not have been modified in its article 43. validly at the initiative of the governments that emerged from the rebellion.

Determinations of this constituent with quality of constitutional proclamation.

PROCLAMATION 1: It is called to ignore and it is ordered to ignore the presumed recognition of the state of Campeche, leaving its territory under the original jurisdiction of the state of Yucatan. Likewise, the reforms to article 43 of the Constitution that make up this supposed entity are declared null and void.

PROCLAMATION 2: It is called to ignore and it is ordered to ignore the presumed recognition of the state of Hidalgo, leaving its territory under the original jurisdiction of the state of the Valley of Mexico. Likewise, the reforms to article 43 of the Constitution that make up this supposed entity are declared null and void.

PROCLAMATION 3: It is called to ignore and it is ordered to ignore the presumed recognition of the state of Morelos, leaving its territory under the original jurisdiction of the state of the Valley of Mexico. Likewise, the reforms to article 43 of the Constitution that make up this supposed entity are declared null and void.

PROCLAMATION 4: It is called to ignore and it is ordered to ignore the presumed recognition of the State of Mexico, leaving said territory under the original jurisdiction of the state of “the Valley of Mexico”.

PROCLAMATION 5: It is called to ignore and it is ordered to ignore the presumed recognition of the state of Tepic and/or Nayarit, leaving its territory under the original jurisdiction of the state of Jalisco. Likewise, the reforms to article 43 of the Constitution that make up this supposed entity are declared null and void.

PROCLAMATION 6: It is called to ignore and it is ordered to ignore the presumed recognition of the state of Quintana Roo, leaving its territory under the original jurisdiction of the state of Yucatan. Likewise, the reforms to article 43 of the Constitution that make up this supposed entity are declared null and void.

PROCLAMATION 7: It is called to ignore and it is ordered to ignore the existence of the two Baja Californias known as “south and north”, and from now on there should be only one named as it originally was; territory of Baja California and not two as they are currently known. Likewise, the reforms to article 43 of the Constitution that integrate this supposed entity with two different constituencies are declared null and void.

of legitimacy.

Article 5). – The elections by which Mr. Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada was elected President of the Republic are validated.

PROCLAMATION 1.- In accordance with article 82 of the Constitution of the Constitution of 1857, the President of the Supreme Court is recognized as the current President of the Republic, who, if for any reason could not enter the performance of his office, or in the case of legal failure, in the exercise of full powers, this sovereignty will freely make the choice of some citizen, the one who has previously adopted the platform and the plan solemnly by oath, placing his hand on his heart.

PROCLAMATION 2. – The rebellion or military coup of the year 1876 planned and directed by the public servant, General Don Porfirio Díaz, to undermine the exercise of the sovereignty deposited by the people in the person of the elected president, Don Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada, is declared invalid. .

PROCLAMATION 3. – The rebellion or civil revolution of the year 1910 planned and directed by Don Francisco Indalecio Madero is declared invalid, to the detriment of articles 9, 39 and 128 of the 1857 Constitution.

PROCLAMATION 4. – The rebellion or military coup of the year 1913 planned and directed by the public servant General Don Victoriano Huerta, to undermine the supposed governance of Don Francisco Indalecio Madero, is declared invalid.

PROCLAMATION 5. – The rebellion or military coup of 1914 planned and directed by Don Venustiano Carranza is declared invalid, to the detriment of articles 9, 39 and 128 of the 1857 Constitution.

Of the fullness of the powers for the constituent meeting.

Article 6.- In honor of the peace of the Republic, the Constituent Assembly declares that it will adopt the fullness of all the executive, legislative and judicial powers at the three levels of government, federal, state and municipal.

PROCLAMATION 1.- As of the installation of this constituent, it will continue in the exercise of its legislative, executive and judicial functions, understanding that said action is for reasons of broad jurisdiction, to the detriment of the sovereignty or autonomy of the federal, state powers and municipal, substituting these in their authority that of the federal, local and municipal legislatures, being able to designate a new president of the Republic, also new governors of the states, and the presidents of the courts of the federation or of each federative entity, and in the municipalities equal to the trustees respectively, so that, of course, they cease to carry out their duties; and in case of refusal, the constituent will freely choose the citizens, since the constituent, as has been previously arranged, endorses the sovereignties and autonomies that could be claimed.

PROCLAMATION 2.- It is called to confer all the legislative, executive and judicial powers of the federation, of the States and of the municipalities to the constituent meeting through its legislators.

PROCLAMATION 3.- The federal officials of the three powers, the governors, the local legislatures and the municipal councils that declare to support the plan, will continue to represent the sovereignty that was assigned to them provisionally and in accordance with their particular constitutions.

PROCLAMATION 3.- When only some officials or governors second and not all the legislatures, nor all the councils, only those who second will continue their representation but only provisionally, issuing from now on the call to fill the vacancies without limitation of criteria from among the citizens appointed by the constituent to fill the vacancies of the three levels of government, being disqualified of course, the authorities and those who remain as the newly appointed ones will in turn be invested with the powers of their positions, but also with powers extraordinary, even to issue agreements, decrees or any other type of ordinance without limitation.

PROCLAMATION 4.- Pursuant to the provisions of articles 39 and 117 of the 1857 Constitution, as long as the regulatory laws promised therein are not issued, since they are suspended, it is declared that despite the contingency the powers of the federation and the states that comprise it, have had to enter and will enter from now on in the full exercise of their sovereignty, however, by virtue of the constituent, those who oppose it and those who have cooperated with the governments of de facto, are restricted for the exercise of their duties and subject to the provisions of the laws and this sovereignty, as well as to the persons designated by it.

of the legislative power.

In accordance with article 128 of the 1857 Constitution, only the Congress of the Union number IX (9) can be recognized as legitimately elected, in force until before the year 1876 in which the events of the military rebellion of General Porfirio Díaz took place.

PROCLAMATION 1. – The elections that the electoral organisms have held from the year 1876 to elect authorities of the states of the federation and municipalities are declared invalid.

PROCLAMATION 2. – The state or municipal authorities supposedly elected by electoral bodies from the year 1876, since their election was invalid, were left from the very moment of their election, devoid of any constitutional mission, for this reason, it is called to disappear and any supposed mandate by which some kind of authority had been conferred on them is ordered to disappear.

PROCLAMATION 3. – The Congress of the Union number IX (9) elected before the year 1876 is called to be recognized and ordered to be recognized as valid and legitimately elected, therefore, it is ordered to ignore and ignore the federal congresses following this one .

PROCLAMATION 4. – It is called recognize and it is ordered to recognize all the Congresses of the States in force until before the year 1876, in which the legitimate Constitution of 1857 was suspended due to the military rebellion of Don Porfirio Díaz.

of the judiciary

Article 7.- No personnel of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, nor of the courts of the judicial powers of the States, may continue in office, for this reason this constituent assembly calls for its renewal, whose vacancies will be covered by appointing people that have been selected by the same without limitation of criteria.

PROCLAMATION 1. – The elections or appointments of the personnel of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation and of the courts of the States are declared invalid as of the year 1876, for this reason, it is called to disappear and orders to disappear all kinds of Appointment made in these various instances of all staff and all types of job categories.

PROCLAMATION 2. – The renewal of vacancies of all the personnel of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation and of the Courts of the Judicial Power of all the federative entities of the Mexican Republic is called.

Itinerant character of the constituent.

Article 8.- The powers of the federation now deposited in the constituent, will be established inside or outside the city of Mexico, or in any place, even with an itinerant character as determined by itself.

From army.

Article 9.- The permanent army and the national guard will be reduced to the number designated by this sovereignty, leaving public security in charge of the law enforcement authorities in each of the states and municipalities, who will prevail in their functions.

Every individual from the permanent army and national guard who was reduced, and who adhered to the platform and the plan, will have the right to have their work scope liquidated and be trained for another job as a public servant.

Background:

The armed forces owe their existence to various decrees or legal provisions of a hierarchical level lower than the constitution: The decrees that served as legal support for the creation and operation of the armed forces are called to disappear and are ordered to disappear, such as: of October 22, 1814 relative to article 110, as well as article 28 of the fourth constitutional law of 1836, and its ratification of June 13, 1843, that of April 16, 1861, those of June 12, December 16 and May 13, 1891 and December 3, 1913, April 14 and December 31, 1917, as well as April 6, 1934 and December 31, 1935, November 1, 1937, of December 30, 1939, that of December 31, 1940, that of December 21, 1946, that of December 24, 1958 and December 29, 1956, which in some way established or ratified their competence or denomination in the organic law of public administration, legislation q ue also keeps a hierarchical level lower than the constitution.

ROCLAMATION 1. – The following constitutional powers and obligations are called to be disregarded and ordered to be disregarded as valid: of the President of the Republic: sections IV, V, VI and VIII of article 89 of the Constitution; of the senate section III article 76, and of the congress section XII article 73 of the supposed constitution of 1917, for this reason the appointed personnel lacks any constitutional mission, because the origin of their appointment comes from the provisions of a simple document , vulgar and illegitimate published by the rebels in arms during the years 1910 and 1914.

Of the Declaration of Neutrality and of the new National Civil Guard.

Article 10.- A declaration of neutrality of the Mexican Republic must be made to adopt and adapt as a reference model that of the General Declaration of Neutrality of the American Republics (First Meeting of Consultation of Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Panama – approved on December 3 October 1939).

Obeying the provisions of article 23 of the Constitution of 1857, it is necessary to establish with the character of a civil army that restores the constitutional order, in charge of attending to the external and internal defense of the country, during the constituent assembly and even after, all Mexican citizens. , civilians, men or women, over 60 years of age who are not active public servants nor have they been, can integrate the new National Civil Guard, same as for the exercise of their functions, they will have the right to own and carry weapons in sight, without need for special permits. Those apprehended by them will have the prerogative to have their human, civil, economic, political and cultural rights respected.

PROCLAMATION 1: The neutrality of the Mexican Republic is called to declare and ordered to be declared, adopting as a reference model the General Declaration of Neutrality of the American Republics approved in Panama on October 3, 1939.

PROCLAMATION 2: All Mexican citizens, civilians, men or women, are called to constitute and are ordered to constitute a civil army to restore the constitutional order, in charge of attending to the external and internal defense of the country, during the constituent assembly and even afterwards. , over 60 years of age who are not active public servants or have been, can integrate the new National Civil Guard, same as for the exercise of their functions, they will have the right to own and carry weapons at sight, without the need for special permits. Those apprehended by them will have the prerogative to have their human, civil, economic, political and cultural rights respected.

Of the imprescriptibility of political crimes.

Article 11.- General amnesty is not granted for all political crimes, leaving any dispensation of this nature without effect, political crimes are considered.

Those who had appeared or cooperated with the governments contrary to the 1857 constitution, remain at the disposal of the authorities, and must answer for the public accusation that exists against them established in article 128 of the aforementioned constitution.

PROCLAMATION 1. – The public accusation contained in article 128 of the 1857 Constitution is called for validation and is ordered to be validated, by which those who would have appeared in the governments emanating from the rebellions are held responsible for political crimes, as well as those that they had cooperated with {these.

PROCLAMATION 2. – It is called to appear and it is ordered that they appear, all those who have figured in the governments contrary to the constitution of 1857, who, as of the year 1876, who have figured in the governments of the rebellions, as well as those who had cooperated with them.

PROCLAMATION 3. – The new National Civil Guard is called to be empowered and ordered to be empowered so that, in the exercise of its police functions, it proceeds to locate, arrest and make available to the authority the subjects referred to in article 128 of the Constitution of 1857. This power conferred on the new National Civil Guard does not violate the guarantees of the alleged offenders, because, for the political crimes committed, it is about those that do not prescribe with the passage of time, and that In addition, all its moments are of commission in flagrante delicto, as long as the actions of the governments contrary to the Constitution have not ceased.

Of constitutional inviolability.

Article 12).- In accordance with article 128 of the 1857 Constitution, which establishes the principle of “constitutional inviolability”, it is necessary to examine the validity or legality of the meeting held on February 5, 1917 in the city ​​of Querétaro, summoned by the seditious Chief of a faction of revolutionary rebels, Don Venustiano Carranza, to edit the configuration of a new document that would be called the Constitution of 1917, in substitution of the previous constitution of 1857.

It is clear from the beginning that a meeting of armed revolutionaries with the aim of reforming the Constitution to finally edit the configuration of a new one, required the fulfillment of two essential requirements: the peaceful nature of the meeting and the legally lawful objective of the itself, circumstances that were never present in said meeting, since, as has already been said, it was a meeting of armed revolutionaries with the illicit objective of imposing their own constitutional regulations, with the aim of subordinating the Mexican people with it.

The call originally proposed the reform of the 1857 constitution, however, what really happened is that the configuration of a newly created document called the 1917 Constitution was edited. The original idea of ​​making reforms was cut short by the barrier insurmountable imposed in article 127 of the Constitution of 1857, which prevents the requirements that should be met for an addition or reform to become part of said constitution, which made its reform impossible as was the original idea.

PROCLAMATION 1. – It is called to validate and it is ordered to validate article 127 of the Constitution of 1857, remaining in the terms that it establishes.

PROCLAMATION 2. – The principle of constitutional inviolability enshrined in article 128 of the Constitution of 1857 is called for validation and orders to be validated.

PROCLAMATION 3. – The meeting and the armed meeting of revolutionary rebels held on February 5, 1917 in the city of Querétaro, called by the mutinous chief of a faction of mutineers Don Venustiano Carranza, is called to declare invalid and declared invalid.

PROCLAMATION 4. – The document edited and configured with the name of the Constitution of 1917, by which the bloody neo-military caste of revolutionary rebels tried to replace the legitimate Constitution of 1857, is declared invalid.

PROCLAMATION 5. – It is called to declare and it is ordered to declare that the meeting of February 5, 1917 in the City of Querétaro, called by the rebels of the revolution to reform the Constitution of 1857, did not have the peaceful character that was required, because it was attended by about thirty people armed with military charges.

PROCLAMATION 6. – It is called to declare and it is ordered to declare that the meeting of February 5, 1917 held in the city of Querétaro, did not have a legally acceptable purpose, since, on the contrary, it had the objective of acting against what was foreseen in article 128 of the Constitution of 1857.

 

NOTE 1: Next, the restoration of each of the broken rules that remain to be studied in order to issue the relevant provisions will be addressed.

ARTICLE ____

NOTE 2.- The second stage related to changing the form of government is under construction separately, and can start with the following: